speedwise, on machines with fewer cores or less memory and in situations where I need something a little more powerful than links2.

Nice, I've been looking for something for those situations. What's the "crappiest" computer you've used Epiphany on?

Intel Atom x5-Z8350 quad-core with 2M Cache & 2GB DDR3L-1600 RAM

I actually thought it was a single core machine. This is a machine that
can play YT videos via Firefox usually ok but that chokes on other websites
and on other tasks. For example, I cannot run shotcut or the gimp on it
and expect things to go well and, with the most recent upgrade to debian bookworm, local video playback is choppy where it used to be smooth.

There are some sites that Epiphany will also choke on, but not as many as
when running firefox.

I need to try Epiphany on the dual-core Presario I have here and see what happens. OK, just tried it. Real slow but it did work and wasn't any
slower than firefox or chromium. I think that machine will be a
links2-only machine. ;)


* SLMR 2.1a * Is it OK to yell "MOVIE" in a crowded Fire Station??
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Re: Brave browser
By: Dumas Walker to PHIGAN on Thu Sep 19 2024 09:39 am

Intel Atom x5-Z8350 quad-core with 2M Cache & 2GB DDR3L-1600 RAM

I actually thought it was a single core machine. This is a machine that can

I bought hundreds of Dell E420s, neat little systems with a Core 2 Duo, 1.2 ghz. For the time, it was a great traveler PC - lightweight, and the high-capacity battery stuck out the front, making for a makeshift keyboard rest.

I had one that kept coming back because people reported it was too slow. It had the same stickers and config as the others, but when I ran CPU-Z, realized it had a 1.0 ghz Core 2 Solo. I'd never *heard* of that chip.

It explained why the battery lasted so long. I kept it around, Dell sent me a properly spec'ed D420 to replace it and didn't ask for a return.
---
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

Intel Atom x5-Z8350 quad-core with 2M Cache & 2GB DDR3L-1600 RAM

I actually thought it was a single core machine. This is a machine that ca

I bought hundreds of Dell E420s, neat little systems with a Core 2 Duo, 1.2 ghz. For the time, it was a great traveler PC - lightweight, and the high-capacity battery stuck out the front, making for a makeshift keyboard rest.

Yeah, just because some of them sound underpowered doesn't mean they don't
have their uses.

I had one that kept coming back because people reported it was too slow. It ha
the same stickers and config as the others, but when I ran CPU-Z, realized it had a 1.0 ghz Core 2 Solo. I'd never *heard* of that chip.

It explained why the battery lasted so long. I kept it around, Dell sent me a properly spec'ed D420 to replace it and didn't ask for a return.

LOL, it does explain why the battery lasted longer. I have not heard of
that chip, either. It was nice of them to send out the proper one and not ask for a return.


* SLMR 2.1a * This tagline is umop apisdn
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

³ I avoid it like the plague for a few different reasons:
³
³ 1. It's a Chromium fork, thus polluting the browser market with false choice
³ 2. It's inextricably linked to cryptocurrency (specifically BAT)
³ 3. It's run by outspoken anti-LGBTQIA+ activist Brendan Eich
³
³ I currently use Floorp (a Firefox fork) with æBlock Origin.

I can agree with part 1, Brave should have used the firefox engine or
the engine from Safari instead. Browser makers don't want to do it the
hard way.

---
þ wcQWK 8.0 ÷ Inland Utopia * iutopia.duckdns.org:2323

Firefox just announced something about AI in its browser. I'm hoping the FF forks leave that stuff out.

AI= Bloat, and the API for AI providers is not free either. My favorite
email client wants people to pay 40/yr for using the AI APIS.

---
þ wcQWK 8.0 ÷ Inland Utopia * iutopia.duckdns.org:2323

³ I avoid it like the plague for a few different reasons:
³
³ 1. It's a Chromium fork, thus polluting the browser market with false choice
³ 2. It's inextricably linked to cryptocurrency (specifically BAT)
³ 3. It's run by outspoken anti-LGBTQIA+ activist Brendan Eich
³
³ I currently use Floorp (a Firefox fork) with æBlock Origin.

I can agree with part 1, Brave should have used the firefox engine or
the engine from Safari instead. Browser makers don't want to do it the hard way.

Except for those that do, because the only rule that has no exception is that every rule has an exception. :P

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Windows/32)
* Origin: Archaic Binary * bbs.archaicbinary.net

Re: Re: Brave browser
By: Arelor to Gamgee on Mon Sep 16 2024 18:34:03

It is a bit of a matter of perspective. As far as Chromium remains open-source I don't think the monoculture aspect is too
problematic. Still, it sucks when some non-standard becomes so dominant it starts being difficult to use any alternative.
Thankfully, I think we are far from that point.

Personally I'm more into Firefox. I don't know why, because it's just a browser, but I still prefer it to Chrome and Chromium-based browsers.

The only firefox fork I have ried s Pale Moon. It was ok, but the developpers were assholes and the whole deal was very Windows
centric. They had a very "just use Windows" vibe that got them out of many repositories.

Yeah, that's pretty bad... Heard that Pale Moon developer(s) killed MyPal too. I'll have to find a replacement for it on my older Windows installations.
RetroZilla doesn't solve some SSL/TLS incompatibilities that happen in my use case, but Pale Moon does it pretty okay... unless the website depends too much on JavaScript and CSS 3.

---
þ Synchronet þ MIYANET - bbs.miyanet.moe:(22/23/80/119) | +48 74 884 38 60

Re: Re: Brave browser
By: Neko to Arelor on Mon Sep 30 2024 04:18 pm

Personally I'm more into Firefox. I don't know why, because it's just a browser, but I still prefer it to Chrome and Chromium-based browsers.

I personally prefer Firefox because it is relatively easy to fix.

I say this because most web browsers are broken, in the sense that they leak a whole lot of information about what you do to third parties via telemetric services and the like. With Firefox you can load the arkenfox user.sj file and remove the issue in one sweep.


--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

---
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: Brave browser
By: Arelor to Neko on Thu Oct 03 2024 07:20 pm

Personally I'm more into Firefox. I don't know why, because it's just a browser, but I still prefer it to Chrome and Chromium-based browsers.

I personally prefer Firefox because it is relatively easy to fix.

I say this because most web browsers are broken, in the sense that they leak a whole lot of information about what you do to third parties via telemetric services and the like. With Firefox you can load the arkenfox user.sj file and remove the issue in one sweep.

i ditched firefox because it used to have all those memory holes. i only used it for the addons. now with chrome they have the addons i can use so i'm happier.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Brave browser
By: Arelor to Neko on Thu Oct 03 2024 19:20:54

I personally prefer Firefox because it is relatively easy to fix.

I say this because most web browsers are broken, in the sense that they leak a whole lot of information about what you do to third parties via telemetric
services and the like. With Firefox you can load the arkenfox user.sj file and remove the issue in one sweep.

Cool! I'll have to try it.

---
þ Synchronet þ MIYANET - bbs.miyanet.moe:(22/23/80/119) | +48 74 884 38 60

Hello all,

Wondering if anyone is using the 'Brave' browser. Been seeing some
stories about it, and it claims to prioritize user privacy and do a
good job at ad-blocking. Installed it on my wife's Windows machine and
it seemed pretty decent. Thinking about trying it on Linux but wanted
to know if there are any first-hand experienced user stories on it.

Thanks.



... As a matter of fact, it IS a banana in my pocket.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Brave browser
By: Gamgee to All on Sat Sep 07 2024 07:43 pm

Wondering if anyone is using the 'Brave' browser.

I am using it in Windows 10 on my main machine. Haven't tried it in Linux, but it is on my list...

I really like it a lot more than Chrome - don't use Chrome on my PCs anymore but my work forces me to use it on their machines.

---
þ Synchronet þ TIRED of waiting 2 hours for a taco? GO TO TACOPRONTO.bbs.io

Bf2k+ wrote to Gamgee <=-

Re: Brave browser
By: Gamgee to All on Sat Sep 07 2024 07:43 pm

Wondering if anyone is using the 'Brave' browser.

I am using it in Windows 10 on my main machine. Haven't tried it in Linux, but it is on my list...

I really like it a lot more than Chrome - don't use Chrome on my PCs anymore but my work forces me to use it on their machines.

Okay, thanks for the feedback.



... A woman drove me to drink, and I never had the courtesy to thank her.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Brave browser
By: Gamgee to All on Sat Sep 07 2024 07:43 pm

Hello all,

Wondering if anyone is using the 'Brave' browser. Been seeing some
stories about it, and it claims to prioritize user privacy and do a
good job at ad-blocking. Installed it on my wife's Windows machine and
it seemed pretty decent. Thinking about trying it on Linux but wanted
to know if there are any first-hand experienced user stories on it.

Thanks.

I don't use it myself. I use firefox with some hardcore privacy configuration and LAN-level advertisement and tracker blocking instead.

I have some friends who use Brave. They like it because of the easy ad-blocking for the most part. I think it does a good job blocking Youtube advertisements, which is a big plus for them. I am of the opinion people should not be using Youtube, but more power to them XD


--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

---
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Arelor wrote to Gamgee <=-

Re: Brave browser
By: Gamgee to All on Sat Sep 07 2024 07:43 pm

Wondering if anyone is using the 'Brave' browser. Been seeing some
stories about it, and it claims to prioritize user privacy and do a
good job at ad-blocking. Installed it on my wife's Windows machine and
it seemed pretty decent. Thinking about trying it on Linux but wanted
to know if there are any first-hand experienced user stories on it.

I don't use it myself. I use firefox with some hardcore privacy configuration and LAN-level advertisement and tracker blocking instead.

Okay thanks. I use both Firefox and Chromium now, but it seems like
more and more sites want me to turn off ad-blocking (via browser
extensions), or they won't show me content.

I have some friends who use Brave. They like it because of the easy ad-blocking for the most part. I think it does a good job blocking
Youtube advertisements, which is a big plus for them. I am of the
opinion people should not be using Youtube, but more power to them XD

I don't spend too much time on Youtube, but do look at some things there
now and then. Thanks for the feedback.



... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Hello all,

Wondering if anyone is using the 'Brave' browser. Been seeing some stories about it, and it claims to prioritize user privacy and do a
good job at ad-blocking. Installed it on my wife's Windows machine and it seemed pretty decent. Thinking about trying it on Linux but wanted
to know if there are any first-hand experienced user stories on it.

³ I avoid it like the plague for a few different reasons:
³
³ 1. It's a Chromium fork, thus polluting the browser market with false choice ³ 2. It's inextricably linked to cryptocurrency (specifically BAT)
³ 3. It's run by outspoken anti-LGBTQIA+ activist Brendan Eich
³
³ I currently use Floorp (a Firefox fork) with æBlock Origin. ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ Your time was wasted by ̹ƒlian

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Windows/32)
* Origin: Archaic Binary * bbs.archaicbinary.net

halian wrote to Gamgee <=-

Wondering if anyone is using the 'Brave' browser. Been seeing some stories about it, and it claims to prioritize user privacy and do a
good job at ad-blocking. Installed it on my wife's Windows machine and
it seemed pretty decent. Thinking about trying it on Linux but wanted
to know if there are any first-hand experienced user stories on it.

<Stupid "color codes" removed>

I avoid it like the plague for a few different reasons:

1. It's a Chromium fork, thus polluting the browser market with
false choice
2. It's inextricably linked to cryptocurrency (specifically BAT)
3. It's run by outspoken anti-LGBTQIA+ activist Brendan Eich

I currently use Floorp (a Firefox fork) with æBlock Origin.

1. Okay, so a Chromium fork is "bad", but a Firefox fork is fine.
Got it.

2. Inextricably? It's a simple opt-out choice at initial browser
setup.

3. I don't give a shit about something like that.

------------------------------- Your time was wasted by }{ƒlian

You got one right.

Must be that time of the month - you show up and dump 15 messages or so
across the echos, and then disappear again for a month. Do us all a
favor and don't come back next month, eh?



... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: Brave browser
By: Gamgee to halian on Thu Sep 12 2024 08:05 am

1. It's a Chromium fork, thus polluting the browser market with
false choice

Gamgee >> 1. Okay, so a Chromium fork is "bad", but a Firefox fork is fine.

It is a bit of a matter of perspective. As far as Chromium remains open-source I don't think the monoculture aspect is too problematic. Still, it sucks when some non-standard becomes so dominant it starts being difficult to use any alternative. Thankfully, I think we are far from that point.

The only firefox fork I have ried s Pale Moon. It was ok, but the developpers were assholes and the whole deal was very Windows centric. They had a very "just use Windows" vibe that got them out of many repositories.


--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

---
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL